Koi Pond: Which Pump to Use

When I started in the waterfall and pond design &clients.
construction business in January of 1982, I wasThese easy-to-install, easy-to-make-a-killing liners
asking the same question. I had a slight advantagethat come with a 20-50 year warranty (against
over most when it came to answering thefactory defects only) are actually a meal down
question, "Which pump do I use?"the road to a burrowing gopher, rat, mouse,
I came out of the energy conservation field, so Iground squirrel, chipmunk or muskrat.
was already savvy about energy consumptionHow do I know? I replace liners with concrete and
topics.rebar for a living and I ask if the customer if the
It was a challenge in the seventies, when I wasliner salesman told them the pros and cons about
trying to convince people that they should buythe liner. (Most cons don't!)
the Mitsubishi compact fluorescent bulb to saveBesides a sump pump costing twice as much to
energy. This was the first of its kind and itoperate than a high efficiency, centrifugal pump,
retailed for $12 to $14. Its lumen or light outputthey plug up easily. (By the way, the liner guys
was equal to a 60-watt incandescent bulb, whichchanged the name to a "submersible pump" and
sold for $ .60 in most stores. I needed tothey are now using the term "waterfall pump.")
convince the engineer at Betty Ford Hospital thatConcrete and rebar constructed ponds with
a $12, 12-watt bulb would save the facilitybottom anti-vortex drains seldom, if ever, plug up.
$35,000 a year in electrical costs. I did so, and itIn the industry magazine, Water Garden News,
did!the vice president of product management for
Pumps are no different when it comes tothe Aquascape Company stated,
performance vs. energy consumption. The rule ofA lot of the time, the more energy efficient the
thumb is: If an electrical appliance was engineered[sump] pump, the less solids and debris it can
to be used only occasionally, as opposed tohandle. So often the consumer is excited the
continually, rest assured, it is not engineered orpump will only cost them $10 a month to run, but
built with the highest industry standards in mind.what they did not know is that they are going to
Sump pumps were designed to be submergedhave to be out there 3 times a week, cleaning
underwater and pump that water to a differentthe intake of the [sump] pump to keep it going.
location. Their most common uses are inWater Garden News is a trade magazine that is
basements, bunkers, bilges, and that sort of thing.for manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers in the
These pumps would only come on by demand,water garden industry. This information was not
when a float control indicated a high water level.meant for the consumers' eyes. Until now!
Sump pumps were cheap to buy because theyRead my article entitled Pondless Waterfall:
were built cheaply. It did not matter that theyConcrete vs. Pond Liner ; I cover the subject in
consumed more energy than the more expensivedepth, and expose the truth about pond liner
centrifugal pump, since they only came onpromoters. All of the costs involved in building a
occasionally.pondless waterfall are analyzed by comparing the
These pumps turned out to be perfect for thetwo techniques: using concrete & rebar or a
get-rich-quick liner pond industry for three majorrubber liner.
reasons:The difference in the cost of energy consumption
They were cheap to buy, as were the liners;between a 5700 gallon per hour sump pump and
They were simple to install; anda 5800 gallon per hour high-efficiency centrifugal
They were easy to hide.pump is staggering. The sump pump uses twice
One major drawback of sump pumps that theas much energy, costs $171 more to purchase,
liner pond industry does not share with theirand its warranty is 6 months less! Look before
clients is that they are literally energy sponges.you leap and research before you weep.
But then, that is not the only thing they forget toHappy koi, peace and joy.
mention to their usually innocent and unsuspecting