How pumps work


simondspump.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

mercury outboard water pump pto water truck pumps work
dayton teel pump diagram dayton shallow pump
www.fenner pumps.com Gould Shallow Well Pumps
pto water pumps work Berkley Jet Pump
berkley pump company berkley jet
PUMPS DEMING tokheim transfer pump
cheap Jeep cherokee Water Pumps berkley irrigation pumps
berkley jet pumps GE Electric Heat Pump

The Wages of Science

In the United States, Congress approved,conduits of government involvement in
last month, increases in the 2003research, the universities, are only
budgets of both the National Institutesweakly correlated with growing
of Health and National Scienceprosperity. As Alison Wolf, professor of
Foundation. America is not alone in -education at the University of London
vainly - trying to compensate forelucidates in her seminal tome "Does
imploding capital markets andEducation Matter? Myths about Education
risk-averse financiers.In 1999,and Economic Growth", published last
chancellor Gordon Brown inaugurated ayear, extra years of schooling and wider
$1.6 billion program of "upgradingaccess to university do not necessarily
British science" and commercializing itstranslate to enhanced growth (though
products. This was on top of $1 billiontechnological innovation clearly
invested between 1998-2002. The budgetsdoes).Terence Kealey, a clinical
of the Medical Research Council and thebiochemist, vice-chancellor of the
Biotechnology and Biological SciencesUniversity of Buckingham in England and
Research Council were quadrupledauthor of "The Economic Laws of
overnight.The University Challenge FundScientific Research", is one of a
was set to provide $100 million in seedgrowing band of scholars who dispute the
money to cover costs related to theintuitive linkage between state-propped
hiring of managerial skills, securingscience and economic progress. In an
intellectual property, constructing ainterview published last week by
prototype or preparing a business plan.Scientific American, he recounted how he
Another $30 million went to start-updiscovered that:"Of all the lead
funding of high-tech, high-riskindustrial countries, Japan - the
companies in the UK.According to thecountry investing least in science - was
United Nations Development Programmegrowing fastest. Japanese science grew
(UNDP), the top 29 industrializedspectacularly under laissez-faire. Its
nations invest in R&D more than $600science was actually purer than that of
billion a year. The bulk of this capitalthe U.K. or the U.S. The countries with
is provided by the private sector. Inthe next least investment were France
the United Kingdom, for instance,and Germany, and were growing next
government funds are dwarfed by privatefastest. And the countries with the
financing, according to the Britishmaximum investment were the U.S., Canada
Venture Capital Association. More thanand U.K., all of which were doing very
$80 billion have been ploughed intobadly at the time."The Economist
23,000 companies since 1983, about halfconcurs: "it is hard for governments to
of them in the hi-tech sector. Threepick winners in technology." Innovation
million people are employed in theseand science sprout in - or migrate to -
firms. Investments surged by 36 percentlocations with tough laws regarding
in 2001 to $18 billion.But this Britishintellectual property rights, a
exuberance is a global exception.Evenfunctioning financial system, a culture
the - white hot - life sciences fieldof "thinking outside the box" and a
suffered an 11 percent drop in venturetradition of excellence.Government can
capital investments last year, reportsonly remove obstacles - especially red
the MoneyTree Survey. According to thetape and trade tariffs - and nudge
Ernst & Young 2002 Alberta Technologythings in the right direction by
Report released on Wednesday, theinvesting in infrastructure and
Canadian hi-tech sector is languishinginstitutions. Tax incentives are
with less than $3 billion invested inessential initially. But if the
2002 in seed capital - this despiteauthorities meddle, they are bound to
generous matching funds and tax creditsruin science and be rued by
proffered by many of the provinces asscientists.Still, all forms of science
well as the federal government.Infunding - both public and private - are
Israel, venture capital plunged to $600lacking.State largesse is ideologically
million last year - one fifth its levelconstrained, oft-misallocated,
in 2000. Aware of this cataclysmicinefficient and erratic. In the United
reversal in investor sentiment, theStates, mega projects, such as the
Israeli government set up 24 hi-techSuperconducting Super Collider, with
incubators. But these are able merely tobillions already sunk in, have been
partly cater to the pecuniary needs ofabruptly discontinued as were numerous
less than 20 percent of the projectsother defense-related schemes.
submitted.As governments pick up theAdditionally, some knowledge gleaned in
monumental slack created by thegovernment-funded research is barred
withdrawal of private funding, theyfrom the public domain.But industrial
attempt to rationalize and economize.Themoney can be worse. It comes with
New Jersey Commission of Health Sciencestrings attached. The commercially
Education and Training recently proposeddetrimental results of drug studies have
to merge the state's three publicbeen suppressed by corporate donors on
research universities. Soaring federalmore than one occasion, for instance.
and state budget deficits are likely toCommercial entities are unlikely to
exert added pressure on the alreadysupport basic research as a public good,
strained relationship between academeultimately made available to their
and state - especially with regards tocompetitors as a "spillover benefit".
research priorities and the allocationThis understandable reluctance stifles
of ever-scarcer resources.This frictioninnovation.There is no lack of
is inevitable because the interactionsuggestions on how to square this
between technology and science iscircle.Quoted in the Philadelphia
complex and ill-understood. SomeBusiness Journal, Donald Drakeman, CEO
technological advances spawn newof the Princeton biotech company
scientific fields - the steel industryMedarex, proposed last month to
gave birth to metallurgy, computers toencourage pharmaceutical companies to
computer science and the transistor toshed technologies they have chosen to
solid state physics. The discoveries ofshelve: "Just like you see little
science also lead, though usuallycompanies coming out of the research
circuitously, to technologicalbeing conducted at Harvard and MIT in
breakthroughs - consider the examples ofMassachusetts and Stanford and Berkley
semiconductors and biotechnology.Thus,in California, we could do it out of
it is safe to generalize and say thatJohnson & Johnson and Merck."This would
the technology sector is only the morebe the corporate equivalent of the
visible and alluring tip of the drabberBayh-Dole Act of 1980. The statute made
iceberg of research and development. Theboth academic institutions and
military, universities, institutes andresearchers the owners of inventions or
industry all over the world ploughdiscoveries financed by government
hundreds of billions annually into bothagencies. This unleashed a wave of
basic and applied studies. Butunprecedented self-financing
governments are the most importantentrepreneurship.In the two decades that
sponsors of pure scientific pursuits byfollowed, the number of patents
a long shot.Science is widely perceivedregistered to universities increased
as a public good - its benefits aretenfold and they spun off more than 2200
shared. Rational individuals would dofirms to commercialize the fruits of
well to sit back and copy the outcomesresearch. In the process, they generated
of research - rather than produce widely$40 billion in gross national product
replicated discoveries themselves. Theand created 260,000 jobs.None of this
government has to step in to providewas government financed - though,
them with incentives to innovate.Thus,according to The Economist's Technology
in the minds of most laymen and manyQuarterly, $1 in research usually
economists, science is associatedrequires up to $10,000 in capital to get
exclusively with publicly-fundedto market. This suggests a clear and
universities and the defensemutually profitable division of labor -
establishment. Inventions such as thegovernments should picks up the tab for
jet aircraft and the Internet are oftenbasic research, private capital should
touted as examples of the civiliando the rest, stimulated by the transfer
benefits of publicly funded militaryof intellectual property from state to
research. The pharmaceutical,entrepreneurs.But this raises a host of
biomedical, information technology andcontentious issues.Such a scheme may
space industries, for instance - thoughcondition industry to depend on the
largely private - rely heavily on thestate for advances in pure science, as a
fruits of nonrivalrous (i.e. publickind of hidden subsidy. Research
domain) science sponsored by thepriorities are bound to be politicized
state.The majority of 501 corporationsand lead to massive misallocation of
surveyed by the Department of Financescarce economic resources through pork
and Revenue Canada in 1995-6 reportedbarrel politics and the imposition of
that government funding improved their"national goals". NASA, with its "let's
internal cash flow - an importantput a man on the moon (before the
consideration in the decision toSoviets do)" and the inane International
undertake research and development. MostSpace Station is a sad manifestation of
beneficiaries claimed the tax incentivessuch dangers.Science is the only public
for seven years and recorded employmentgood that is produced by individuals
growth.In the absence of efficientrather than collectives. This inner
capital markets and adventuresomeconflict is difficult to resolve. On the
capitalists, some developing countriesone hand, why should the public purse
have taken this propensity to extremes.enrich entrepreneurs? On the other hand,
In the Philippines, close to 100 percentprofit-driven investors seek temporary
of all R&D is government-financed. Themonopolies in the form of intellectual
meltdown of foreign direct investmentproperty rights. Why would they share
flows - they declined by nearly threethis cornucopia with others, as pure
fifths since 2000 - only rendered statescientists are compelled to do?The
involvement more indispensable.But thispartnership between basic research and
is not a universal trend. South Korea,applied science has always been an
for instance, effected a successfuluneasy one. It has grown more so as
transition to private venture capitalmonetary returns on scientific insight
which now - even after the Asian turmoilhave soared and as capital available for
of 1997 and the global downturn of 2001commercialization multiplied. The future
- amounts to four fifths of all spendingof science itself is at stake.Were
on R&D.Thus, supporting ubiquitousgovernments to exit the field, basic
government entanglement in science isresearch would likely crumble. Were they
overdoing it. Most applied R&D is stillto micromanage it - applied science and
conducted by privately owned industrialentrepreneurship would suffer. It is a
outfits. Even "pure" science -fine balancing act and, judging by the
unadulterated by greed and commerce - isstate of both universities and startups,
sometimes bankrolled by privatea precarious one as well.
endowments and foundations.Moreover, the



1 A B C D E F 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138